(Part 2) Pros and Cons of Recent Legislative Proposals for Student Aid Programs

The elimination of direct subsidized loans and Parent PLUS loans, combined with caps on borrowing for students and families, represents a significant shift in how federal student aid is structured. These changes would have substantial implications for students, families, higher education institutions, and the broader economy. Let's break down the pros and cons, along with the potential implications of these changes:

1. Eliminating Direct Subsidized Loans

Direct Subsidized Loans are federal loans offered to undergraduate students who demonstrate financial need. The U.S. Department of Education pays the interest on these loans while the student is in school, during the grace period, and during deferment periods. The elimination of these loans would have several consequences:

Implications:

  • Increased Borrowing Costs for Students: Students would have to pay the interest on their loans immediately, instead of having it subsidized by the government. This could significantly increase the total amount students owe over the life of the loan.

  • Higher Debt Burden: Without subsidized loans, low-income students who previously relied on these loans may find themselves accumulating more debt because they would be responsible for paying interest during school. This could increase the overall cost of education for students who are already financially vulnerable.

  • Disproportionate Impact on Low-Income Students: Since subsidized loans are designed to support students with the most financial need, their elimination would disproportionately impact students from low-income families, making it more difficult for them to afford college.

Pros:

  • Reduction in Government Spending: Eliminating subsidized loans would reduce the amount of federal funds spent on higher education, as the government would no longer need to cover the interest costs for students.

  • Encouraging Responsible Borrowing: With no interest subsidies, students might be more cautious about taking on debt, as they would face the full cost of borrowing upfront.

Cons:

  • Increased Financial Pressure on Students: Low-income students may be forced to take out larger loans or seek alternative forms of financing, putting them at a greater financial risk.

  • Reduced Access to Higher Education: The elimination of subsidized loans could create a barrier to entry for students from low-income backgrounds, reducing their ability to attend and complete college.

2. Eliminating Parent PLUS Loans

Parent PLUS Loans are federal loans that parents can take out to help pay for their children's education. These loans have a higher interest rate than other federal loans and are not based on financial need.

Implications:

  • Higher Financial Strain on Families: If Parent PLUS loans are eliminated, parents would be unable to borrow federal funds to help cover the cost of their children's education, placing a greater financial burden on the student. This could result in students taking on more debt in their own names, which may carry long-term consequences for their financial futures.

  • Limited Access for Middle-Class Families: Middle-class families who typically rely on Parent PLUS loans to bridge the gap between federal student loans and the total cost of education would be impacted. Without these loans, they may need to seek private loans or reduce their financial contribution to their child’s education, limiting access to higher education for middle-class students.

  • Strain on College Enrollment: If students are unable to secure funding through Parent PLUS loans, some may be unable to attend college or may need to reduce their course load, potentially delaying graduation or dropping out.

Pros:

  • Reduced Debt for Parents: Eliminating Parent PLUS loans could protect parents from taking on significant debt. Since many parents have limited income and retirement savings, avoiding the burden of Parent PLUS loans might be beneficial for their financial health.

  • Potential for More Targeted Aid: If students need to take out loans instead of relying on their parents, it could result in more direct aid for students (such as grants and student loans) rather than subsidizing parent borrowing.

Cons:

  • Increased Student Debt: With the loss of Parent PLUS loans, students may be forced to borrow more in their own name, potentially taking on more student loan debt to cover the costs of college. This could significantly increase the overall student loan burden across the country.

  • Negative Impact on College Enrollment: Parents may be less able or willing to help cover the costs of their children's education, potentially leading to fewer students attending college or attending less expensive, lower-quality institutions. This could affect overall college enrollment and completion rates.

3. Putting Caps on Borrowing for Students and Families

Placing caps on borrowing for both students and families could drastically alter the financial landscape for those pursuing higher education.

Implications:

  • Limited Access to Loans for High-Cost Institutions: Some families may find that borrowing limits make it harder to pay for higher-cost institutions (e.g., private colleges or out-of-state public universities), particularly if the borrowing caps are relatively low. This could reduce the number of students attending elite or expensive schools and shift enrollment toward more affordable institutions.

  • Increased Financial Pressure on Students and Families: Caps could force students and families to find alternative ways of paying for education, such as relying more heavily on scholarships, part-time work, or family savings. This might leave students with less time to focus on academics, leading to increased stress and potential dropout rates.

  • Potential for Greater Inequality: Borrowing caps could disproportionately affect families who are unable to pay for higher education upfront. Families with low to moderate incomes may be especially harmed by borrowing caps, as they typically rely on loans to make up the difference between their savings and the full cost of education. This could widen the gap between those who can afford college and those who cannot.

Pros:

  • Encouragement of Alternative Funding: Caps on borrowing could encourage students to explore other financial resources, such as scholarships, grants, or working while studying, which could help them avoid accumulating too much debt.

  • More Sustainable Borrowing Practices: Caps might help prevent students and families from overborrowing, keeping loan amounts within a manageable range. This could prevent borrowers from taking on excessive debt they may struggle to repay after graduation.

Cons:

  • Increased Barriers to College Access: If caps on borrowing are too restrictive, they could prevent students from attending college altogether or attending their preferred institutions. Students from low-income families who cannot afford to pay upfront for college would be especially impacted.

  • Potential for Greater Reliance on Private Loans: Students and families might turn to private lenders for additional funding if federal loans are capped. Private loans often come with higher interest rates and less favorable repayment terms, which could exacerbate the debt burden on students.

Overall Implications of These Changes:

  • Increased Financial Barriers: The elimination of subsidized loans and Parent PLUS loans, combined with borrowing caps, would likely make it harder for students from low and middle-income families to afford college, potentially leading to reduced college enrollment or increased student debt.

  • Strain on Financial Aid Systems: If students and families can’t borrow as much through federal loans, institutions and states may need to increase their own financial aid offerings to fill the gap. Alternatively, families may turn to private loans or alternative financing options that could place students at greater financial risk.

  • Changing the College Landscape: Institutions may respond by adjusting their pricing models, offering more competitive scholarships, or shifting their focus to making education more affordable and accessible. However, some schools, particularly those with high tuition rates, could see a drop in enrollment if students are unable to meet financial requirements.

For continued insights on this topic, look out for Part 3 of this 3-part series! At Omnia Pathways, we believe that paying for college is one of the largest, most significant investments that a student and their families make in their lifetimes. We recognize this process is overwhelming and offer assistance in your search for scholarships, grants, and loan opportunities. Please see our Services for more information and schedule a Free Consultation, to help you accomplish your college admissions goals.

*Citations will be included at the end of this 3-part series.

Previous
Previous

(Part 3) College Accountability Measures: What They Are and Why They Matter

Next
Next

(Part 1) What are the recent legislative proposals for student aid programs?